Developing Sustaining An Corporate Culture -Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The Developing Sustaining An Corporate Culture? Answer: Introduction The above mentioned case study is about the ethical dilemma of supporting child labor in order to enhance the yearly revenue of an Organization. A product manager of a company, which sells chocolate sweets that include with small plastic toys, visited a Thailand toy manufacturer to finalize a two years old contract. There he came to know that in Thailand the toys are supplied at a much cheaper rate compared to any other global supplier, without compromising with the quality of the Toys. In order to check the reliability of the fact, the product manager urged to see the process of production of the toys. Surprisingly he found that instead of getting manufactured in a workshop, the toys are assembled by poor families including children. The manager evidenced a large family along with children of age between 5 to 14 years is assembling the toys for a prolonged time. The manufacturer of the toys stated the manager that this method of manufacturing that includes child labor is well established in Thailand since it reduce the production cost while maintaining the quality of the product. Considering the fact that finalizing this deal will ensure cost saving of his company, the manager completed the paper work. However, while purchasing souvenirs for his seven years old nieces, the act of supporting the unethical practice of child labor for financial enhancement of his business seemed unethical to the manager. The toy manufacturing company of Thailand engages child labor for toy production to lower the production cost while enhancing their market. While due to low supply cost of the toys, the confectionary company will evidence a crucial enhancement in the annual revenue, the future of the children working there for the production of the toys will get ruined[1]. Thus, in order to eradicate this evil practice, confectionary companies like the one mentioned in the case study needs to stop purchasing product from the toy producers in spite of getting the toys at a lower price. Who cares whose shares? This case study is about two ethical dilemmas faced by a regional marketing director of one of the biggest pharmaceutical companies of the world named PharmChemCo (PCC). The high demand of PCC in global stock market has not only enhanced the bank balance of the marketing director but also made him a successful stock market investor. The fact that a huge amount of the directors bonuses has been paid by PCC in the stock market is a major reason behind his success in the professional field. However, in a recent meeting, the manager has came to know that Scientist from a leading university in US has found that the best selling herbicides of PCC contains fatal side effect. Considering the fact that this news will soon get publish a renowned magazine, the stock market value of PCC will certainly go down. All the managers are instructed to keep the news confidential so that PCC can find out strategies to deal with the situation[2]. Since the marketing director has invested a huge amount of money on PCC in the stock exchange, in order to save himself from the huge loss, he has decided to sell his share before the news break out[3]. However, the buyer of the stock will suffer a huge loss in near future. The decision of selling a stock, backed by a huge loss of money to an individual, intentionally, can be seen as an ethical dilemma. Along with that, it will be unethical to use the confidential about knowledge for personal benefit especially when it will cause huge loss to the company. Moreover, his best friend Freddie had also invested his own money heavily on PCC along with advising his clients with major funds to invest on the same. This situation has given rise to another major ethical dilemma. If the Marketing director informs his best friend Freddie about the research about PCC, Freddie will not only sell his own shares of PCC, but will also advice all his clients and to do the same before the article about the research is published. This unexpected drop of share price even before the publication of the research article will impose a highly negative impact on PCC. Being the marketing director of PCC, the act of leaking the companys confidential information will be an unethical and illegal act for the marketing director. However, if he doesnt inform his best friend Freddie, that individual, along with the clients to whom he had suggested to invest will suffer a huge loss. This in turn, may impose adverse effect on the friendship between Freddie and the director. Off your face on Facebook This case study contains ethical dilemma associated with appointing new employees in a Pharmaceutical organization. The Human Resource Manager of AllCure Pharmaceuticals requires appointing an employee for a very crucial post. The post demands high reliability, skills and working attitude. Along with this, the employee needs to have social skills to maintain good relation between the approving authorities, clinics and departments in the organization. Among the three selected well-qualified candidates, two freshly graduated really good applicants were chosen on the basis of their skills and knowledge. Both of the candidates were female. However, in order to determine their social communication skill the manager checked both of the candidates social media accounts. From the Facebook profile of the 1st candidate, it was found that she is very sociable and a well travelled person. However, the Face book account of the second candidate was very difficult to trace and finally when the Face book account was found, several shirtless pictures of the candidate while partying along with her habit to use alcohol and illegal drugs in high amount was discovered. However, during the interview, the performance of the second candidate was slightly better than that of the 1st candidate[4]. The decision of whether to appoint the second candidate based on her interview or not has given rise to an ethical dilemma[5]. If the manager chose to appoint her based on her professional skills and overlooking her social acts, there will be a risk of bad impression of the company in case if her pictures get leaked. The decision becomes more complex since the company needs a highly sensitive and contentious individual for the post. It will also impose negative impact on the patients and other employees of the organization. On the other hand, it may fall under unethical act to reject a candidate by stalking her Facebook account and on the basis of her personal activities especially when she the most deserving one on the basis of the interview conducted. Organic food-what is an organic label really worth? This case study deals with the ethical issues associated with unethical marketing fake organic products. While consumers of Europe and America spend a premium amount on organic products, they are often misguided by the food producing organization. The department of Agriculture in US allows organic products that are 95 percent organic to use the organic tag. However, a majority of those products contain flavor enhancing natural ingredients, monosodium glutamate and carrageen which according to some individuals cause health hazards. Moreover, in several cases conventionally modified seeds often get combined with organic products and initiatives are taken in order to stop this are still rare. In spite of the fact that the net worth of organic marketing industry of America and Europe is 40 billion dollar per year, in 2007, the organic certificate of several dairy suppliers of US was taken back due to marketing inorganic milk as organic milk[6]. In 2009, Americas food industry was detected of marketing Soymilk as organic milk. Cases of marketing inorganic eggs as organic eggs have also being reported by German industries. While several countries have strict regulations about selling organic products, the major ethical issues faced by those countries are miserable treatment with animals in the firms. While Italy has become a crucial center of producing and issuing fake organic certificates, the certifying system of China associated with Organic products is not reliable at all. According to the survey conducted by USDA, the production of Organic product requires much larger area compared to the space required to produce conventional product. Therefore, in order to meet up the continuously increasing need of organic products in developing countries, farmers across the world are burning forests in order to turn the land into farmland[7]. This process, in turn, is causing harm to environment by emitting a huge amount of carbon dioxide. Along with that, this method is also hazardous for the species of the forests and water cycle. Therefore, in order to avoid this highly hazardous act of deforestation, organic firms should be allowed to use a little amount of pesticides. Uzbek cotton: a new spin on responsible sourcing? In this case study the ethical dilemma of boycotting Uzbekistans cotton due to prevalence of child labor has been discussed. The Government of Uzbekistan, a country with human rights violation, corruption and low level democracy, rigidly controls the overall cotton production using the Soviet-Style Quota system that ensure compulsory state purchase. The farmers are highly pressurized to meet the yearly target of cotton production. They suffer from exploitation, low pay. In order to fulfill the target production of the year, forced child labors is highly prevalent in Uzbekistan. The major reasons behind involving children in cotton productions are lack of advanced technologies which ensure manual labor, high pressure from government to meet the target and urge to earn money since the amount of money paid to the farmer is very low. During the harvesting season, schools remain closed and the children are forced to work in the field for a daily pay as less as 40 cents. They even have to pay for their own food and transport and in most of the cases they are often left with no money even after investing tremendous labor for the whole day. In addition to the child labor issue, human right violation and environmental destruction have been raised against Uzbekistans cotton production strategy in the 2005 report named White Gold: The True Cost of Cotton. In order to eradicate the issues, the Environmental Justice Foundation repeatedly requested the International Business Community to ban Uzbekistans cotton. However, according to the community, it will be difficult to detect the source of cotton due to the complexity of the supply chain. Due to continuous pressure on clothing industries, in 2007, two well-known companies banned Uzbekistan cotton. Slowly the trend spread among several clothing companies and finally in 2008 the Government o Uzbekistan announced ban to child labor up to the age of 16. However, in the fields of Uzbekistan, the problem of forced child labor was still there. In 2011, Responsible Sourcing Network, a NGO, launched a cotton pledge to intensify the boycott[8]. As a result of this, 150 companies, including popular apparel companies like Zara, Gucci and Adidas participated in this movement which in turn compelled the government of Uzbekistan to announce that school children should not be allowed to pick cotton. However, soon it was found that Uzbekistans Government had started employing older children of age between 15 to 18 years along with Organizational employees like teachers, nurses and doctors for Cotton Harvesting. Therefore, the pledge was extended to stop forced adult labor and in 2013 the Uzbekistans Government finally allowed International Labor Organization to monitor the cotton harvest. In spite of the ban of Uzbeks cotton in western countries due to forced child and adult labor, Uzbekistans Government is now targeting eastern clothing industries like China, Bangladesh and South Korea. The growing demand for cotton in the eastern clothing industries has provided the Uzbek government the opportunity to reinforce forced child and adult labor. Besides that, considering the fact that spinning mills combines a number of cottons, it is nearly impossible to guarantee that Uzbeks cotton has not been used. In spite of the fact that methods of tracing cotton supply in western apparel companies are still improving, till now, there is no guarantee that the pledge is effectively maintained. Reference List: Bazoche, P. et al,Willingness To Pay For Pesticide Reduction In The EU: Nothing But Organic?(2018) Ford, Robert C. and Woodrow D. Richardson Richardson,Ethical Decision Making: A Review Of The Empirical Literature(9th ed, 2012) Huijsmans, Roy and Simon Baker,Child Trafficking: Worst Form Of Child Labour, Or Worst Approach To Young Migrants?(2018) Janssen, Meike and Ulrich Hamm,Product Labelling In The Market For Organic Food: Consumer Preferences And Willingness-To-Pay For Different Organic Certification Logos(2018) Schwartz, Mark S.,Developing And Sustaining An Ethical Corporate Culture: The Core Elements(2018) Shapiro, Joan Poliner and Jacqueline Anne Stefkovich,Ethical Leadership And Decision Making In Education(Routledge, 2016) Thiel, Chase E. et al,Leader Ethical Decision-Making In Organizations: Strategies For Sensemaking(1st ed, 2012) Turker, Duygu and Ceren Altuntas,Sustainable Supply Chain Management In The Fast Fashion Industry: An Analysis Of Corporate Reports(201